Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.


This book is the result of four years of rigorous research and academic peer-review, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Hetvābhāsa

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

Hetvābhāsa literally means ‘seemingly reasonable or logical’.

Meaning[edit]

Nyāya or logic is an important aspect of all the philosophical systems. It is needed either to prove one’s standpoint or to contradict and disprove that of the opponent. One of the means of knowledge, called ‘pramāṇas’ or valid sources of knowledge, is anumāna or inference.

Inference[edit]

The most frequently quoted and widely accepted mode of expressing the anumāna pramāṇa is as follows:

  • There is fire on the yonder hill, because smoke is rising from there. It is well-known from our experience (of direct perception) that wherever there is smoke, there is fire. Hence, by seeing the smoke, even though we may not be actually seeing the fire, we can infer the existence of fire there.
  • In this example, the rising of smoke which is invariably associated with fire, is technically called ‘hetu,’ ‘liṅga’ or ‘sādhana’. When this hetu is only an ābhāsa (illusory), it is called ‘hetvābhāsa’.
  • For instance, ‘All bipeds are rational. Swans are bipeds. Hence, swans are rational.’ The conclusion of this inference is false because the hetu given (that all bipeds are rational) is itself an ābhāsa, illusory or unreal.

Classification[edit]

Hetvābhāsa is of five kinds:

  1. Savyabhicāra
  2. Viruddha
  3. Satpratipakṣa
  4. Asiddha
  5. Bādhita

References[edit]

  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore

Contributors to this article

Explore Other Articles