Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences faced by Indian American children after exposure to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We demonstrate that there is an intimate connection—an almost exact correspondence—between James Mill’s colonial-racist discourse (Mill was the head of the British East India Company) and the current school textbook discourse. This racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces the same psychological impacts on Indian American children that racism typically causes: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon akin to racelessness, where children dissociate from the traditions and culture of their ancestors.


This book is the result of four years of rigorous research, reflecting our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within academia.

Ekabhavika doctrine

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia

By Swami Harshananda

Ekabhavika doctrine literally means ‘the doctrine that many karmas produce one birth’.

The doctrine of karma and punarjanma (rebirth) has been widely accepted by almost all the schools of philosophy. This dogma has been described in the Vyāsabhāsya on the Yogasutras[1] of Patañjali (200 B. C.). The word ‘ekabhavika’ has been introduced and discussed here. Literally, it means ‘producing one birth’.

In the residual karma producing rebirth, four alternatives, are put forth and only one is accepted which rules out the other three. The alternatives are:

  1. Does one karma produce one birth?
  2. Does one karma cause several births?
  3. Do several karmas result in several births?
  4. Do several karmas give rise to only one birth?

There are many karmas recognized from ancient time, accepting the first two alternatives gives rise to a highly confusing situation. People will lose all faith in the karmas prescribed by the śāstras. The third alternative has to be ruled out since it is not possible for a jīva (individual soul) to assume several births simultaneously.

The philosophy of pariśeṣanyāya or the doctrine of elimination of the alternatives accepts only the last alternative to be true. Among the accumulated karmas, one major karma along with several minor karmas which are compatible with the major ones, becomes ripe at the time of death and causes the next birth, deciding its:

  1. Jāti - type
  2. Āyus - duration of life
  3. Bhoga - experiences, good and bad


References[edit]

  1. Yogasutras 2.73
  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore

Contributors to this article

Explore Other Articles