Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children Book Cover.webp

Colonial Discourse and the Suffering of Indian American Children is now published after academic peer-review and available through open access.

In this book, we analyze the psycho-social consequences that Indian American children face after they are exposed to the school textbook discourse on Hinduism and ancient India. We show that there is an intimate connection―an almost exact correspondence―between James Mill’s ( a prominent politician in Britain and head of the British East India Company) colonial-racist discourse and the current school-textbook discourse. Consequently, this archaic and racist discourse, camouflaged under the cover of political correctness, produces in the Indian American children the same psychological impact as racism is known to produce: shame, inferiority, embarrassment, identity confusion, assimilation, and a phenomenon similar to racelessness where the children dissociate from the tradition and culture of their ancestors

This book is an outcome of 4 years of rigorous research as a part of our ongoing commitment at Hindupedia to challenge the representation of Hindu Dharma within Academia.

Anumāna

From Hindupedia, the Hindu Encyclopedia
(Redirected from Anumana)

By Swami Harshananda

Anumāna literally means ‘to measure or draw conclusions, following [a given premise]’.

Indian systems of philosophy have paid considerable attention to the problem of knowledge and the means of obtaining it. The object to be known is called ‘prameya’ (‘that which is measured or known’), the means of knowing it is ‘pramāṇa’ (‘the measure’) and the knowledge obtained thus is called ‘pramā’ (‘that which is measured’).

The pramāṇas accepted by the various schools vary from two to six. However, almost all the theistic schools agreed on three of them and consider them as more basic. They are :

  1. Pratyakṣa - Direct perception
  2. Anumāna - Inference
  3. Āptavākya - Testimony

The āgama or scriptural testimony is considered the highest in last category.

When smoke is seen on a distant hill, though fire itself is not seen directly, we conclude that there is fire on the hill since smoke is invariably associated with fire. Here, the means of our knowledge of fire on the hill is ‘anumāna’ or inference. We are measuring (mā = to measure) or knowing the object of knowledge (fire), following (anu = to follow) a given premise (i.e., the smoke and the invariable concomitance of smoke with fire known to exist from our earlier experiences).

Some technical terms commonly used while defining anumāna are :

  1. ‘Sādhya’ - What is to be proved; here, the fire
  2. ‘Hetu’ - The cause for such inference; here, the smoke
  3. Pakṣa’ - That which takes a side, or causes doubts; here, the hill


References[edit]

  • The Concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Swami Harshananda, Ram Krishna Math, Bangalore

Contributors to this article

Explore Other Articles